Skip to main content



Disagreeing with Matt Dillahunty: Withholding Judgement

I have great respect for Matt Dillahunty (who I will refer to as Matt in this post, as I believe that is how he would like to be addressed anyway). He is a solidly good thinker and has occasional flashes of brilliance that are both inspiring and thought provoking. No really, the guy is worth listening to. 
However, there are ideas Matt holds to that don't sit well with me. It's not that I think Matt is disingenuous, it's just that I think some of his points of view are not totally accurate. Matt seems to be committed to the idea that someone can be totally neutral and objective in a belief. In other words someone can realistically say that they neither believe something nor do they believe that it is false. 
One example he likes to use is the pocket change example. He asks his interlocutor whether he has an even or odd amount of money in his pocket. By this example he tries to demonstrate that neither belief, in odd or even amounts is rational. 
My primary objection to th…

Latest Posts

Being Lost

Bushey's Five Reasons

When The Robots Take Over

Why Secularism Is Important

False Legitimacy & Religion

Freemarketeers vs. Freedom

Freemarketeers vs. Wealth

Freemarketeers vs. Prostitution

Free Market Fundamentalism & The War on Drugs

Why Send People to Mars?